Overcoming the Limitations of Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Solving Complex Partial Differential Equations
The rise of deep learning has transformed numerous fields, including the challenging task of solving partial differential equations (PDEs). Among the many innovative approaches, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have gained significant attention for their ability to solve PDEs by incorporating physical laws directly into the neural network's loss function. While PINNs have demonstrated success in academic settings, their application in industrial scenarios has revealed several limitations. In the following work, these limitations are pointed out and solutions are proposed in order to shift towards Physics-Embedded models for enhanced robustness.
From Object to Graph thanks to the natural conversion between a FE mesh and a Graph.
The Promise and Pitfalls of Physics-Informed Neural Networks
PINNs offer a unique advantage by embedding the underlying physics into the learning process. This allows for the direct solution of PDEs without needing extensive data, as the network learns the solution space based on the governing equations themselves. However, as promising as this approach sounds, PINNs are not without flaws, particularly when applied to real-world, industrial problems.
Key Challenges of PINNs
Lack of Physical Invariances: PINNs struggle to inherently respect physical invariances such as symmetry, conservation laws, and other fundamental properties. This can lead to solutions that, while mathematically valid, are physically unrealistic.
Difficulty with Complex Geometries: Industrial applications often involve intricate geometries and boundary conditions. PINNs, designed primarily for simpler academic cases, struggle to handle these complexities effectively.
Poor Generalization Capabilities: A significant drawback of PINNs is their limited ability to generalize across different scenarios. In industrial settings, where conditions can vary widely, this lack of adaptability poses a critical issue.
Limitations of Automatic Differentiation: The reliance on automatic differentiation within PINNs, although powerful, can introduce inefficiencies, especially when dealing with the non-linearities and high-dimensional spaces typical of complex PDEs.
A Hybrid Approach: Combining Graph Neural Networks with Finite Element Methods
To address these limitations, we propose a hybrid approach that merges Physics-Informed Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with traditional numerical kernels from finite element methods (FEMs). This approach leverages the strengths of both methodologies to overcome the weaknesses of PINNs.
Key Advantages of the Hybrid Approach
Enhanced Handling of Complex Geometries: GNNs, with their inherent ability to model relationships within complex structures, are better suited for tackling intricate geometries. When combined with FEM kernels, this approach can effectively manage the complexities encountered in industrial applications.
Improved Generalization: The hybrid model is designed to generalize more effectively across different physical scenarios. This is achieved by incorporating the robustness of FEMs with the adaptability of GNNs, allowing the model to maintain accuracy across a broader range of conditions.
Fig. 8. (Left) Geometry used for training, meshed domain. (Middle) Boundary set Γ1, in red. (Right) Boundary set Γ2, in red.
Ablation Study Support: Through rigorous ablation studies, we have validated the theoretical properties of the Transvalor hybrid model. These studies demonstrate that the combination of GNNs and FEMs not only retains the strengths of each approach but also compensates for their individual weaknesses.
Application to Real-World Scenarios: We applied the Transvalor hybrid approach to solve PDEs in both two-dimensional and three-dimensional geometries. The results highlight the model's ability to handle complex, real-world industrial problems with greater accuracy and efficiency than traditional PINNs.
Conclusion: A New Path Forward in Industrial PDE Solving
The introduction of a hybrid approach that combines Physics-Informed GNNs with FEM numerical kernels marks a significant step forward in solving complex PDEs. While PINNs have shown promise, their limitations in industrial settings cannot be overlooked. By integrating the strengths of GNNs and FEMs, the Transvalor approach offers a robust, scalable solution capable of addressing the challenges posed by real-world applications.
For industries looking to leverage deep learning in solving PDEs, this hybrid model represents a more reliable and effective alternative, paving the way for broader adoption of AI-driven methods in industrial problem-solving.
You can get the official journal paper or an open access version from here
M. Chenaud, F. Magoulès, J. Alves
